Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
Once you've identified potential publication venues, it's time to do some exploration and evaluation work. Consider these for each:
Safeguard against low-quality and predatory publishers
Quality of publication venues varies greatly, even within a well-regarded publisher. It is always a good idea to perform a preliminary investigation into the legitimacy of any publication, but especially of those you are unfamiliar with. Begin by asking these questions/performing these searches, and consult this guide's section on Predatory Publishing for more information and helpful tools:
- If the publication venue states that they are indexed, check to ensure that they actually are.
- Do the people on their editorial board actually exist? Do they list their involvement with the publication on their CV?
- Is the location of the publisher an actual place (e.g., look on Google maps - is it someone's house? An empty lot? A parking garage?)? Can you call them? Does someone answer?
- Search for one of their articles/books in your preferred search engine or database. Does it come up?
- Do you have many unanswered questions about the legitimacy of this publication? Is anyone from their team available to answer them?
- Is the publication venue clear about the publishing process and fess associated with publishing with them?
- Citation chase an older book/article, if possible (e.g., go to Google Scholar, find the publication, and click "cited by #"). Who has cited it and in what context?
- Search for news references to the publication (if this is part of your criteria) or other places where you want your work to show up.
- Can you find the journal/book in the Penn Library catalog/Articles+?
- What does the publication venue do to market your work?