Skip to Main Content
Go to Penn Libraries homepage   Go to Guides homepage

Evidence Synthesis (Systematic Reviews): Developing the Research Question

This guide is intended to provide information on conducting evidence synthesis reviews including systematic reviews

Asking the right question

All evidence synthesis reviews start with a question. The research question will:

  • Determine the type of review (systematic, scoping, rapid, umbrella, etc.)
  • Inform the search strategy
  • Assist with identifying inclusion and exclusion criteria
  • Guide data extraction and quality analysis

PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) is a common framework used to develop questions for systematic reviews in healthcare. However, many evidence synthesis questions don't quite fit this framework. See the sections below for examples of frameworks that are appropriate for different disciplines and review types.

 

Research question frameworks

PICO - used for systematic reviews of interventions in healthcare, but can be adapted to other disciplines

Patient/Population

Who is your review studying and how would you describe them? 

Intervention

What is the main proposed intervention, prognostic factor, or exposure you are looking at?

Comparison

What is the current or alternative intervention? (no intervention, lower dosage of the same drug, placebo, surgical procedure, etc.)

 For diagnostic studies, is there another diagnostic tool to compare against?

Outcomes

What measurable outcome is affected?

Example question: In patients with osteoarthritis of the knee (population), does adding physical therapy to NSAID treatment (intervention) reduce pain, inflammation, and progression of OA (outcomes) when compared to NSAID treatment alone (comparison)?

 

PCC - Used for scoping reviews

Population What are the important characteristics of the participants? (e.g. age, race, gender, role) 
Concept What is the concept or "phenomena of interest" that you want to explore? It may reflect the elements of a systematic review (e.g. interventions, comparisons, outcomes)
Context What are the issues surrounding or influencing the concept? (e.g. setting, cultural or environmental factors, interests or experiences that are important or relevant to the population) 
Example question: What is the experience of caregivers of autistic children (population) who have received language-based interventions (concept) in home versus school or other settings outside the home (context)

 

SPIDER - Used for reviews of qualitative literature

Sample

What are the characteristics of the group being studied? 

Phenomenon of Interest

What behaviors, experiences, or interventions are being explored or evaluated?

Design

How is the data being gathered? 

Evaluation 

What are the measurable outcomes?

Research or study Type

What qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods study type is used? 
Example question: 

What are the experiences (evaluation) of healthcare workers (sample) regarding burnout prevention interventions in acute care settings (phenomenon of interest) as assessed by surveys or interviews (design)?

Research type: qualitative or mixed methods

 

More frameworks

Penn Libraries Home Search the Catalog
(215) 898-7555