Digital Publishing at Penn: Digital Scholarly Publications

Digital publications offer unique affordances for publishing scholarship by enabling authors to articulate scholarly ideas through innovative uses of interactive digital tools, data, and multimedia enhancements. Academic libraries and presses acquire and support the development of a broad range of publication types including monographs, journals, novella (mid-length) projects, and special projects with varying amount of text. There are multiple approaches to translating these publication types into digital formats: Some of the main formats include: 

• Multimodal: Publications that include multimodal digital resources like audio or video files, interactive enhancements, linked digitized materials, and other items that would be flattened in a print publication. 
• Born-digital: Publications that are created to be exclusively digital, and not in parallel to or supporting a print edition.
• Hybrid: Publications intended to exist in both digital and print editions; if the digital edition includes multimodal resources, the print edition may be slightly different due to formatting limitations, however the text of the editions is typically the same. 
• Ancillary: A digital companion project for a print publication; this is typically shorter in length 
• Iterative: A digital publication developed and published in iterative steps; this may lead to a future monograph publication and serve as a way to distribute content in advance of completing the project, or be the publication choice. 
• Enhanced: A publication that enhances text with additional links or embedded resources. 
• OER (Open Educational Resource): Publications designed for use in teaching, developed for or during a class. 

Learn more about digital publishing considerations through the following resources: 

• Bashir, Shahzad. “Designing History for the Web: A Digital Book Report,” History and Theory: Studies in the Philosophy of History, Theme Issue: Digital History (2022).
• Bayer, Lisa. "Sustaining and Reimagining the Monograph," AUPresses Digital Digest (March 2022).
• Gagliardi, Susan E. and Constantine Petridis. “Mapping Senufo: Reframing Questions, Reevaluating Sources, and Reimagining a Digital Monograph,” History in Africa: A Journal of Debates, Methods, and Source Analysis 48 (2021), pp. 165-209.
• Levy, Allison and Sarah McKee. Multimodal Digital Monographs: Content, Collaboration, Community (2022).
• Maxwell, John W. et al. “Mind the Gap: A Landscape Analysis of Open Source Publishing Tools and Platforms” (July 2019).
• Paul, Elsie et al. “Our Process: Making This Book,” in As I Remember It: Teachings from the Life of a Sliammon Elder (University of British Columbia Press, 2019).
• Smith, Kylie. “Decision Making in Digital Publishing,” in Jim Crow in the Asylum: Psychiatry and Civil Rights in the American South (Manifold edition)

• Smith, Kylie. “Why I Chose Open Access and Manifold,” in Jim Crow in the Asylum: Psychiatry and Civil Rights in the American South (Manifold edition).

• Turner, Nicole Myers. “Note from the Author about the Digital Humanities and This Book,” in Soul Liberty: The Evolution of Black Religious Politics in Postemancipation Virginia (UNC Press, 2020; Fulcrum edition).
• Watkinson, Charles and Melissa Pitts. "Re-Envisioning Humanities Infrastructure," Inside Higher Ed (February 2021)
• Wulf, Karin. “Does Born-Digital Mean Rethinking Peer Review?” The Scholarly Kitchen (Sept. 2017).
• Brown University Library. Born-Digital Scholarly Publishing: Resources and Roadmaps. An NEH Institute on Advanced Topics in the Digital Humanities. (2022)

Reach out to RDDS with questions about teaching and research with open access digital publications and support for creating them in Manifold and Scalar: libraryrdds@pobox.upenn.edu