Is the H-index a useful or ethical measure? See some counterpoints in Philip Ball's 2012 editorial for the Guardian, "The h-index, also known as the stag's antlers."
Different databases give different h-indexes, as you'll see in the tutorial below. Google Scholar found an h-index of 35 for an author, while Scopus had 17.
Retrieving h-index in Scopus will only account for publications and citations in Scopus. Scopus has a limited number of book entries, for example, so if an author has several widely cited books that aren’t indexed in Scopus, then those entries will not appear in the Scopus count. They may be available in Google Scholar.
Google Scholar, on the other hand, is more likely to contain erroneous associations – especially for non-verified profiles. So make sure that the publications associated with a specific author are truly written by that author.
Another limitation of h-index is that it looks at cited publications. It doesn’t represent scholarly productivity or impact of other kinds of publications. What if an author has published multiple newspaper editorials? Or if the author has a popular substack or blog presence? Or created an innovative digital exhibition? None of this productivity or impact would be captured by h-index if those publications were widely read and experienced but not formally cited.
This tutorial will walkthrough finding the H-index for a given author. H-index is a metric designed to measure a combination of an author’s impact and productivity. The formula for H-index is:
The highest value of h, when h articles have at minimum h citations.
If an author has six total publications, each of which respectively gained 1, 2, 3, 3, 5, and 20 cites from other works:
So the h-index for that author would be 3.
In this tutorial, we will be using both Google Scholar and Scopus to find the H-index without having to do manual calculations.
In Google Scholar, if a researcher has a verified profile, their h-index is available. Search for John Paul MacDuffie and select his verified profile.
The h-index should be available in a side-panel. MacDuffie’s h-index in Google Scholar is listed at 35.
Open Scopus, and begin by searching for a researcher of interest. We’ll search for John MacDuffie. Select the Authors tab, and type in your researcher’s name.
There are two entries for John MacDuffie, and one of them appears to be the correct entry. The h-index is listed in the third column as 17. This is very different than the Google Scholar count, and we’ll discuss the implications of that in the Limitations section below.
We’re fairly sure that the second entry isn’t the same as our John MacDuffie, but what if he was? Would that impact the h-index? To find out, we need to see if any of those three publications by the second John MacDuffie-Woodburn has at least 18 citations. Click on the 3 documents. Under MacDuffie Woodburn.
Two of the three publications have less than 18 publications, and wouldn’t change the h-index. But the third publication has more. So if these two entries were actually representing the same person (which, in this case, they are not), there would actually be 18 documents with at least 18 citations, and the h-index would be 18.
Whenever you see multiple entries for a single person in Scopus, and you’re confident that those multiple entries represent one person, it’s always good to do a double-check the citation counts of the other entries in order to get an accurate h-index count.